{"id":5342,"date":"2026-06-01T19:05:57","date_gmt":"2026-06-01T16:05:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/brisc.ro\/?p=5342"},"modified":"2026-06-01T19:06:01","modified_gmt":"2026-06-01T16:06:01","slug":"judecatoria-cluj-napoca-a-constatat-prescriptia-executarii-silite-intervenita-pe-parcursul-executarii-si-a-anulat-actele-de-executare-ulterioare-instanta-a-retinut-ca-adresele-catre-autoritati-inter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/brisc.ro\/en\/judecatoria-cluj-napoca-a-constatat-prescriptia-executarii-silite-intervenita-pe-parcursul-executarii-si-a-anulat-actele-de-executare-ulterioare-instanta-a-retinut-ca-adresele-catre-autoritati-inter\/","title":{"rendered":"Prescrip\u021bia execut\u0103rii silite intervenit\u0103 pe parcursul execut\u0103rii. Actele administrative ale executorului \u0219i notific\u0103rile de cesiune nu \u00eentrerup cursul prescrip\u021biei"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-judecatoria-cluj-napoca-anularea-actelor-de-executare-emise-dupa-implinirea-termenului-de-prescrip\u021bie\">Judec\u0103toria Cluj-Napoca: anularea actelor de executare emise dup\u0103 \u00eemplinirea termenului de prescrip\u021bie<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Prin Sentin\u021ba civil\u0103 nr. 1068\/2026, pronun\u021bat\u0103 de Judec\u0103toria Cluj-Napoca, instan\u021ba a admis o contesta\u021bie la executare \u0219i a constatat c\u0103 dreptul creditorului de a solicita continuarea execut\u0103rii silite s-a prescris \u00een cursul execut\u0103rii, ca urmare a lipsei unor acte de executare efective timp de peste trei ani. \u00cen consecin\u021b\u0103, au fost anulate toate actele de executare \u00eentocmite ulterior \u00eemplinirii termenului de prescrip\u021bie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea este relevant\u0103 deoarece clarific\u0103 diferen\u021ba dintre actele de executare silit\u0103 propriu-zise \u0219i simplele demersuri administrative efectuate \u00een dosarul execu\u021bional, stabilind c\u0103 doar primele au efect \u00eentreruptiv de prescrip\u021bie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-situa\u021bia-de-fapt-executare-silita-inceputa-in-anul-2012-\u0219i-reluata-dupa-mai-bine-de-un-deceniu\">Situa\u021bia de fapt. Executare silit\u0103 \u00eenceput\u0103 \u00een anul 2012 \u0219i reluat\u0103 dup\u0103 mai bine de un deceniu<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Executarea silit\u0103 a fost pornit\u0103 \u00een baza unui contract de credit \u00eencheiat \u00een anul 2006, creditorul ini\u021bial solicit\u00e2nd executarea silit\u0103 \u00een anul 2012. Dosarul execu\u021bional a fost format pe rolul unui birou executor judec\u0103toresc \u0219i ulterior preluat de un alt executor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Debitorul a formulat contesta\u021bie la executare dup\u0103 ce, \u00een luna mai 2025, a luat cuno\u0219tin\u021b\u0103 despre instituirea unei popriri asupra veniturilor sale. Acesta a sus\u021binut c\u0103:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>nu a mai fost notificat o perioad\u0103 foarte lung\u0103 de timp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dreptul creditorului de a solicita executarea silit\u0103 era prescris;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>crean\u021ba nu era individualizat\u0103 corespunz\u0103tor, nefiind prezentat\u0103 modalitatea de calcul \u0219i actualizare a sumelor urm\u0103rite.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen cadrul procesului, contestatorul a precizat c\u0103 nu invoc\u0103 doar prescrip\u021bia anterioar\u0103 \u00eenceperii execut\u0103rii silite, ci \u0219i prescrip\u021bia intervenit\u0103 pe parcursul execut\u0103rii, ar\u0103t\u00e2nd c\u0103 ultimul act de executare cu efect \u00eentreruptiv fusese emis cu mul\u021bi ani \u00eenainte de reluarea execut\u0103rii din 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-determinarea-legii-procesuale-aplicabile\">Determinarea legii procesuale aplicabile<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Instan\u021ba a re\u021binut c\u0103 executarea silit\u0103 fusese \u00eenceput\u0103 anterior intr\u0103rii \u00een vigoare a noului Cod de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103, motiv pentru care \u00eentregul regim juridic al execut\u0103rii \u0219i al prescrip\u021biei era guvernat de dispozi\u021biile Codului de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103 din 1865.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-art-24-cod-procedura-civila\">Art. 24 Cod procedur\u0103 civil\u0103<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201eDispozi\u021biile legii noi de procedur\u0103 se aplic\u0103 numai proceselor \u0219i execut\u0103rilor silite \u00eencepute dup\u0103 intrarea sa \u00een vigoare.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Pornind de la aceast\u0103 regul\u0103 tranzitorie, instan\u021ba a aplicat dispozi\u021biile vechiului Cod de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103 at\u00e2t \u00een materia contesta\u021biei la executare, c\u00e2t \u0219i \u00een materia prescrip\u021biei execut\u0103rii silite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-excep\u021bia-tardivita\u021bii-contesta\u021biei-la-executare\">Excep\u021bia tardivit\u0103\u021bii contesta\u021biei la executare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Creditorul a invocat tardivitatea contesta\u021biei, ar\u0103t\u00e2nd c\u0103 primele acte de executare au fost comunicate \u00eenc\u0103 din anul 2012.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Instan\u021ba a f\u0103cut \u00eens\u0103 o distinc\u021bie esen\u021bial\u0103 \u00eentre:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>contesta\u021bia \u00eempotriva execut\u0103rii silite \u00eens\u0103\u0219i;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>contesta\u021bia \u00eempotriva unor acte de executare ulterioare.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-art-401-alin-1-lit-c-cod-procedura-civila-1865\">Art. 401 alin. (1) lit. c) Cod procedur\u0103 civil\u0103 1865<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201eContesta\u021bia se poate face \u00een termen de 15 zile de la data c\u00e2nd contestatorul a primit soma\u021bia ori de la data c\u00e2nd a luat cuno\u0219tin\u021b\u0103 de primul act de executare, \u00een cazurile \u00een care nu a primit soma\u021bia sau executarea se face f\u0103r\u0103 soma\u021bie.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-art-401-alin-1-lit-a-cod-procedura-civila-1865\">Art. 401 alin. (1) lit. a) Cod procedur\u0103 civil\u0103 1865<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201eContesta\u021bia se poate face \u00een termen de 15 zile de la data c\u00e2nd contestatorul a luat cuno\u0219tin\u021b\u0103 de actul de executare pe care \u00eel contest\u0103.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Analiz\u00e2nd dovezile de comunicare din dosarul execu\u021bional, instan\u021ba a constatat c\u0103 primele acte de executare fuseser\u0103 comunicate legal \u00een anul 2012. Din acest motiv:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>criticile privind prescrip\u021bia anterioar\u0103 \u00eenceperii execut\u0103rii silite;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>criticile privind caracterul necert al crean\u021bei;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>au fost considerate formulate peste termenul legal \u0219i au fost respinse ca tardive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen schimb, sus\u021binerile referitoare la prescrip\u021bia intervenit\u0103 \u00een cursul execut\u0103rii silite au fost apreciate ca fiind formulate \u00een termen, deoarece au fost invocate \u00een raport de actele de executare comunicate \u00een anul 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-regimul-juridic-al-prescrip\u021biei-executarii-silite-potrivit-vechiului-cod-de-procedura-civila\">Regimul juridic al prescrip\u021biei execut\u0103rii silite potrivit vechiului Cod de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Pentru analiza motivului r\u0103mas \u00een discu\u021bie, instan\u021ba a avut \u00een vedere dispozi\u021biile privind \u00eentreruperea prescrip\u021biei execut\u0103rii silite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-art-405\u00b2-alin-1-lit-d-cod-procedura-civila-1865\">Art. 405\u00b2 alin. (1) lit. d) Cod procedur\u0103 civil\u0103 1865<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201eCursul prescrip\u021biei se \u00eentrerupe pe data \u00eendeplinirii \u00een cursul execut\u0103rii silite a unui act de executare.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Instan\u021ba a subliniat c\u0103 textul legal consacr\u0103 posibilitatea intervenirii prescrip\u021biei chiar \u00een timpul execut\u0103rii silite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cu alte cuvinte, fiecare act de executare produce efect \u00eentreruptiv \u0219i determin\u0103 \u00eenceperea unui nou termen de prescrip\u021bie. Dac\u0103 \u00eens\u0103 executorul \u0219i creditorul r\u0103m\u00e2n \u00een pasivitate o perioad\u0103 mai mare dec\u00e2t termenul legal de prescrip\u021bie, dreptul de a continua executarea se stinge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-ce-acte-au-fost-identificate-in-dosarul-execu\u021bional\">Ce acte au fost identificate \u00een dosarul execu\u021bional<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Analiz\u00e2nd dosarul execu\u021bional, instan\u021ba a constatat existen\u021ba urm\u0103toarelor demersuri:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>soma\u021bia emis\u0103 \u00een anul 2012;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>adrese c\u0103tre prim\u0103rii pentru ob\u021binerea de informa\u021bii;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>solicit\u0103ri c\u0103tre OCPI;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>interog\u0103ri efectuate \u00een baze de date;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>notific\u0103ri privind cesiunile succesive de crean\u021b\u0103;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>cereri formulate de creditori pentru continuarea execut\u0103rii silite.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Instan\u021ba a observat c\u0103, \u00een intervalul analizat:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>nu au fost instituite popriri;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>nu au fost efectuate urm\u0103riri efective asupra bunurilor;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>nu au fost realizate acte care s\u0103 conduc\u0103 efectiv la recuperarea crean\u021bei.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-de-ce-nu-intrerup-prescrip\u021bia-adresele-catre-autorita\u021bi-\u0219i-interogarile-efectuate-de-executor\">De ce nu \u00eentrerup prescrip\u021bia adresele c\u0103tre autorit\u0103\u021bi \u0219i interog\u0103rile efectuate de executor<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Un aspect deosebit de important al hot\u0103r\u00e2rii \u00eel reprezint\u0103 delimitarea dintre actele administrative \u0219i actele de executare silit\u0103 propriu-zise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Instan\u021ba a re\u021binut expres c\u0103:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>adresele c\u0103tre prim\u0103rii;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>solicit\u0103rile adresate birourilor de cadastru;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>verific\u0103rile \u00een baze de date;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>interog\u0103rile efectuate de executor;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>nu reprezint\u0103 acte de executare silit\u0103 \u0219i nu produc efect \u00eentreruptiv asupra prescrip\u021biei.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-motivarea-instan\u021bei\">Motivarea instan\u021bei<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Potrivit ra\u021bionamentului instan\u021bei, efect \u00eentreruptiv au doar acele acte care urm\u0103resc \u00een mod efectiv realizarea crean\u021bei \u0219i care conduc concret la executarea acesteia, chiar \u0219i par\u021bial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Simplele demersuri de documentare sau de ob\u021binere a unor informa\u021bii despre patrimoniul debitorului nu au aptitudinea de a \u00eentrerupe termenul de prescrip\u021bie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-de-ce-notificarile-de-cesiune-nu-intrerup-prescrip\u021bia-executarii-silite\">De ce notific\u0103rile de cesiune nu \u00eentrerup prescrip\u021bia execut\u0103rii silite<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Creditorul a sus\u021binut c\u0103 notific\u0103rile privind cesiunile succesive ale crean\u021bei ar avea efect \u00eentreruptiv de prescrip\u021bie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Instan\u021ba a respins categoric aceast\u0103 ap\u0103rare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-argumentele-instan\u021bei\">Argumentele instan\u021bei<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Judec\u0103toria a ar\u0103tat c\u0103:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>art. 405\u00b2 alin. (1) Cod procedur\u0103 civil\u0103 1865 nu include notificarea cesiunii printre cauzele de \u00eentrerupere;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>nici normele privind cesiunea de crean\u021b\u0103 nu prev\u0103d un asemenea efect;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>notificarea cesiunii reprezint\u0103 doar o informare privind schimbarea titularului crean\u021bei \u0219i nu un act de executare silit\u0103.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen consecin\u021b\u0103, transmiterea crean\u021bei de la un creditor la altul nu poate re\u00eenvia \u0219i nici prelungi termenul de prescrip\u021bie al execut\u0103rii silite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-constatatea-intervenirii-prescrip\u021biei-executarii-silite\">Constatatea intervenirii prescrip\u021biei execut\u0103rii silite<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Dup\u0103 examinarea \u00eentregului dosar execu\u021bional, instan\u021ba a stabilit c\u0103 ultimul act de executare cu efect \u00eentreruptiv a fost soma\u021bia comunicat\u0103 \u00een anul 2012.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>De la acel moment \u0219i p\u00e2n\u0103 la emiterea noilor acte de executare din anul 2025 nu au mai fost efectuate acte de executare \u00een sensul art. 405\u00b2 alin. (1) lit. d) Cod procedur\u0103 civil\u0103 1865.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen aceste condi\u021bii, termenul de prescrip\u021bie s-a \u00eemplinit cu mult \u00eenainte de reluarea execut\u0103rii, astfel \u00eenc\u00e2t creditorul nu mai avea dreptul de a continua executarea silit\u0103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-solu\u021bia-instan\u021bei\">Solu\u021bia instan\u021bei<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Judec\u0103toria Cluj-Napoca a dispus:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>admiterea \u00een parte a contesta\u021biei la executare;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>anularea tuturor actelor de executare \u00eentocmite dup\u0103 \u00eemplinirea termenului de prescrip\u021bie;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>obligarea creditoarei la plata cheltuielilor de judecat\u0103;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>restituirea taxei judiciare de timbru dup\u0103 r\u0103m\u00e2nerea definitiv\u0103 a hot\u0103r\u00e2rii.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-concluzii-prescrip\u021bia-executarii-silite-poate-interveni-\u0219i-dupa-inceperea-executarii\">Concluzii. Prescrip\u021bia execut\u0103rii silite poate interveni \u0219i dup\u0103 \u00eenceperea execut\u0103rii<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea confirm\u0103 o regul\u0103 esen\u021bial\u0103 \u00een materia execut\u0103rii silite: simpla existen\u021b\u0103 a unui dosar execu\u021bional nu \u00eempiedic\u0103 \u00eemplinirea prescrip\u021biei.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pentru a men\u021bine executarea \u00een termen, este necesar\u0103 efectuarea unor veritabile acte de executare silit\u0103, apte s\u0103 conduc\u0103 efectiv la realizarea crean\u021bei. Adresele administrative, interog\u0103rile \u00een baze de date, solicit\u0103rile de informa\u021bii sau notific\u0103rile de cesiune nu au caracterul unor acte de executare \u0219i nu \u00eentrerup cursul prescrip\u021biei.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Din perspectiv\u0103 practic\u0103, solu\u021bia reprezint\u0103 un argument important \u00een litigii privind <strong>prescrip\u021bia execut\u0103rii silite<\/strong>, <strong>anularea popririi<\/strong>, <strong>contesta\u021bia la executare \u00eempotriva recuperatorilor de crean\u021be<\/strong>, <strong>efectele cesiunii de crean\u021b\u0103 asupra execut\u0103rii silite<\/strong> \u0219i <strong>identificarea actelor care \u00eentrerup prescrip\u021bia execut\u0103rii silite<\/strong>, teme frecvent \u00eent\u00e2lnite \u00een practica instan\u021belor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Judec\u0103toria Cluj-Napoca: anularea actelor de executare emise dup\u0103 \u00eemplinirea termenului de prescrip\u021bie Prin Sentin\u021ba civil\u0103 nr. 1068\/2026, pronun\u021bat\u0103 de Judec\u0103toria Cluj-Napoca, instan\u021ba a admis o contesta\u021bie la executare \u0219i a constatat c\u0103 dreptul creditorului de a solicita continuarea execut\u0103rii silite s-a prescris \u00een cursul execut\u0103rii, ca urmare a lipsei unor acte de executare efective timp &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"Prescrip\u021bia execut\u0103rii silite intervenit\u0103 pe parcursul execut\u0103rii. Actele administrative ale executorului \u0219i notific\u0103rile de cesiune nu \u00eentrerup cursul prescrip\u021biei\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/brisc.ro\/en\/judecatoria-cluj-napoca-a-constatat-prescriptia-executarii-silite-intervenita-pe-parcursul-executarii-si-a-anulat-actele-de-executare-ulterioare-instanta-a-retinut-ca-adresele-catre-autoritati-inter\/#more-5342\" aria-label=\"Read more about Prescrip\u021bia execut\u0103rii silite intervenit\u0103 pe parcursul execut\u0103rii. Actele administrative ale executorului \u0219i notific\u0103rile de cesiune nu \u00eentrerup cursul prescrip\u021biei\">Vezi articol<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,49,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5342","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-credite-bancare","category-drept-civil","category-studii-de-caz","masonry-post","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-50"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/brisc.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5342","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/brisc.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/brisc.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brisc.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brisc.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5342"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/brisc.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5342\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5343,"href":"https:\/\/brisc.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5342\/revisions\/5343"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/brisc.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5342"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brisc.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5342"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brisc.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5342"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}