Urbanism Attorney Cluj: Obligating the Mayor to Issue the Building Permit by Judicial Means
Cluj Tribunal forces permit issuance after ruling PUG easement without expropriation infringes property rights.
Cluj Tribunal forces permit issuance after ruling PUG easement without expropriation infringes property rights.
Court orders demolition of illegal buildings in Apahida after invalid building permit; lack of PUZ deemed unlawful.
Case Study Real Estate Attorney Cluj: Achieved Objectives The administrative courts in Cluj-Napoca held that introducing a restriction in the General Urban Plan (PUG) that requires transferring a portion of one’s land due to a public road easement (servitude) is an abuse when the authority fails to expropriate the land in question; it violates the …
Court orders register entry confirming administrator’s resignation after associate failed to record it, making cessation enforceable.
Abusive Application of the Maximum Fine Provided by Law by the Urbanism Control and Construction Discipline Service. Lack of Proportionality Between the Committed Act and the Applied Sanction. The company was sanctioned by a notice of finding and contravention by the Local Police General Directorate with the maximum fine provided by Law No. 50/1991 in …
Court orders payment for drilling work despite no written contract, ruling debt was certain, liquid, and due.
Court rejects 78,000 lei damage claim from construction site in Cluj due to lack of concrete evidence of damage and binding documentation.
Obliging the National Commission for Property Compensation to resolve with priority the administrative file established under Law no. 10/2001. Reducing the waiting time until compensation is granted for a property in Cluj-Napoca abusively taken during the communist regime in Romania. RELEVANCE OF THE CASE The issue of measures to complete the restitution process, whether in …
Relevance of the Case The law gives an interested party the possibility of summoning a third party in guarantee, against whom a separate guarantee or damages claim might be pursued. From the moment the claim is filed in court and the summoning in guarantee is communicated, the guarantor becomes a party in the civil process …
RELEVANCE OF THE CASE This case study is relevant both from the perspective of applying the Civil Code over time and from the perspective of statutes of limitations. Also important are the procedural rules that regulate the obligation of the plaintiff to prove their own claims by evidence that underpins the assertions made in the …
14-16, Dorobantilor street
Cluj City Center
2nd floor, room 210
400121, Cluj-Napoca